ProPrivacy is reader supported and sometimes receives a commission when you make purchases using links on this site.

DreamHost Claims ‘Huge Victory’ for Privacy Against US Department of Justice

After a US court issued a warrant ordering DreamHost to turn over millions of IP addresses, the web-hosting service claims a reduction in the scope of the ruling is a massive win for everyone on the internet.


In the months leading up to President Donald Trump’s inauguration on 20 January 2017, millions visited the website The website's aim, it says, is to "provide the framework needed for mass protests to shut down the inauguration of Donald Trump." Many, including student groups, used the website to find and spread information about the upcoming protests.


Among the largely peaceful demonstrations, a small number of the protesters are alleged to have caused wilful damage to private property, and behaved violently towards law enforcement officers. This resulted in the launch of a Department of Justice (DoJ) investigation.


As part of the investigation, on 12 July the DoJ obtained a warrant to seize information related to and its users from the premises of the web hosting service DreamHost. This was much to the annoyance of many in the online community.


The DoJ warrant demanded that DreamHost provide the IP addresses of the 1.3 million users that visited the site leading up to the inauguration. In addition, the warrant called for the names, physical addresses, email addresses, contact information, and even photographs of those suspected of any illegal activity.


Although DreamHost says it has been "working with the Department of Justice to comply with the legal process," the web hosting service decided to make the request for information public, stating that it felt the scope of the warrant was "highly untargeted." In the opposition motion submitted by DreamHost, the company challenged that the warrant violates the fourth amendment, in that "the all-encompassing disclosures it requires are unreasonable."


These claims were backed up by digital civil liberties advocates at Electronic Frontier Foundation, who wrote that "no plausible explanation exists for a search warrant of this breadth."


Under mounting pressure from online privacy groups, journalists, and members of the public, the Department of Justice eventually modified its original request. It stated that it was unaware of the amount of information DreamHost held on users, specifically the IP addresses of the 1.3 million users who visited the site after 20 January. It went on to say that it had no interest in those who visited the site after the protests ended.


Despite hailing this as a huge win for privacy, DreamHost went on to state publicly that the amendments did not go far enough. Many of the visitors to, it felt, were still being unnecessarily targeted in the investigation, despite not being involved in any illegal activity.


In the latest development, at a Superior Court hearing at on 24 August, Chief Judge Morin confirmed the validity of the warrant and ordered that DreamHost turn over all information requested in the revised DoJ warrant. The investigation, however, was placed under heavy restrictions.


After hearing the concerns of DreamHost, Judge Morin ordered that a minimization plan be put in place to protect those users who it was deemed had no interest in inciting violence at the protest.


The court that the DoJ submit for review a list of the names of all investigators with access to the seized information, along with a details of the methods for combing through the data. It also ruled that the process must be overseen by the court, and that the DoJ will not be allowed to "conduct the investigation in a bubble."


Although DreamHost was eventually ordered to turn over the IP addresses of many who had no involvement in illegal activity, the company are hailing this as a huge victory for online privacy. "We made the internet better," read their latest blog post. Certainly, if they had not challenged the warrant, the private information of many US citizens would now be involved in a case with which they had nothing to do.

Is this as big as victory as DreamHost is claiming? Let us know in the comments.

Written by: Ray Walsh

Digital privacy expert with 5 years experience testing and reviewing VPNs. He's been quoted in The Express, The Times, The Washington Post, The Register, CNET & many more. 


Charles Malinowski
on September 2, 2017
The judge should have flat overruled the DOJ request for any and all information regarding to the visitors of the website, either before, or after, the inauguration, as there is absolutely zero basis for the belief that any of the protesters who were engaged in any violent or malicious activity had ever even visited the website. For all the demonstrably overzealous, fascist, and racist Jeffrey Beauregard Sessions lll knows, any and all perpetrators of violent or malicious activity during the inauguration don't even have Internet access. There is absolutely zero proof that there is any correlation whatsoever between violent or malicious activity and any Internet activity at all, let alone on the website This is nothing but a monumental fishing expedition on the part of Jeffrey Sessions grasping at straws he confined to trying implicate Donald Trump for refusing himself from the Russia investigations. Just because an individual visited the website doesn't mean they were even at the inauguration let alone engaged in any violent or malicious activity. There certainly were not 1.3 million violent and malicious actors during the inauguration because the entire inauguration crowd wasn't even that big. Estimates of the crowd size at the inauguration was between 250,000 and a maximum 600,000, which is anywhere from 1/5 to less than half of the 1.3 million records requested by the DOJ. Very clearly if the maximum size of the inauguration crowd was 600,000 people then there certainly couldn't have been 1.3 million individuals committing violent and malicious crimes. On the face of it the DOJ warrant is not only overly broad but overly ambiguous. The American people very unwisely elected Donald Trump president, and instead they got a delusional, vindictive, ego maniacal, narcissist with delusions of grandeur, and a monarchy complex, along with a administration of full of toadying suck ups who will do anything to promote not only the presidents twisted ideology, but their own twisted ideology.
on September 2, 2017
Victory? Certainly not! One more reason not to use a US based VPN!

Write Your Own Comment

Your comment has been sent to the queue. It will appear shortly.

Your comment has been sent to the queue. It will appear shortly.

Your comment has been sent to the queue. It will appear shortly.

  Your comment has been sent to the queue. It will appear shortly.

We recommend you check out one of these alternatives:

The fastest VPN we test, unblocks everything, with amazing service all round

A large brand offering great value at a cheap price

One of the largest VPNs, voted best VPN by Reddit

One of the cheapest VPNs out there, but an incredibly good service